Are we sure VR solutions couldn't be handled like for boderless fullscreen tools, in a single page?
There wouldn't be space for tables there indeed, but it's not like they aren't already a thing elsewhere
Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.
Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.
Are we sure VR solutions couldn't be handled like for boderless fullscreen tools, in a single page?
There wouldn't be space for tables there indeed, but it's not like they aren't already a thing elsewhere
I mostly created the page so the ugly red links disappear in the VR template. Also, couldn't the tables just be extendable or is there another issues if we throw them into one page?
Well, the TriDef 3D page is quite in depth, but I think much content could be shaved off. What would the page be called? Virtual reality tools?
Oh.. Damn, it's a lot of stuff.
And if it cannot be summed up, I guess dedicated pages are necessary.
Do you think it's wordy or that streamlining that is not possible?
Well, for the installation, we can probably just refer to the website, and the ugly table could be replaced by a link to the user forum.
If you think their guide is fine, sure.
Even though, experience tell me most of times it is not.
In my opinion then, such lists make sense when people specifically look for these features when (aka before) buying games (for example, they don't want DRM, or they'd like a cooperative game to play with friends)
Do you think this is the case for 3D games?
Or that conversely people first buy games, and only then they look for stereoscopic support?
I mean, 99% of times getting tridef, 3d vision or iz3d to work is just a matter of patience, experimenting with settings after all (or at most with cheat engine).
Whilst no matter what you do, the other features are never "fixable" on your side.
Honestly, I am not sure. Do you think it would make sense to make a summary article for all 3D pages, and provide a link to the TriDef page for further insight? Or should we just leave all the articles the way they are?
Well, in the meantime (if you have experience with this kind of things) you can work with "current layout". Include the information you believe to be important and all.
If we then realize many of the issues are common... we might consider a single page I guess
Note that the Glossary:TriDef 3D entry is currently written for the Oculus Rift. The normal 3D functionality is much more straightforward.
Can't stereoscopy be considered a "subset" of Virtual Reality?
What's the difference between Oculus Rift support and "normal" one?