Care to explain your reverts about Alan Wake 2 Epic DRM? I can partially understand your first revert of user Future-proof, since the caveats aren't minor for some people. But you could've done what I've done and just changed the DRM symbol and leave the important info. There are many people that care about DRM-freedom and put work in the testing of games and reporting their valuable findings.
Topic on User talk:Macgovern
Simply put, the kind of DRM freedom you're referring to is considered too much detail for PCGamingWiki's target audience (see https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/PCGamingWiki:Editing_guide/Wiki_policy#Who_the_articles_are_for). I know you'll disagree, but that's what's been settled on.
That said, the information can be moved to the article's talk page since, historically, those have functionally been used to document information related to the game, but too detailed for the actual article.
Sorry, but that makes no sense and I don't see that the content of this page backs your position in any way. PCGW always has been for beginners and advanced users. A "first time user" also includes everyone who makes his purchase dependent on the DRM of the game. And furthermore: this is NOT about cracks. Besides: please tell me, where do you draw the line when to omit said DRM information? Zero caveats, one caveat, only minor? Who defines this. There are many games here that don't have 100% functionality when launched without their resp. clients AND where this is mentioned correctly on the page itself. Info about DRM is an important part in this wiki (all kind of DRM methods, lists for DRM-free games for every store etc.) Don't act like this isn't the case.
In all honesty, we don't draw a line. It's made up on an article-by-article basis. Any semblance of a standardized definition is coincidence.
And that's all there is to say. I put the information back in the article (see https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Alan_Wake_II&type=revision&diff=1452770&oldid=1452769).
I'm done here.