Undoing someone's edits without reason, especially when someone clearly knowledgeable about the Legacy of Kain series provides a good, valid reason, is unacceptable. I have locked the page in question until tomorrow. Please explain yourself here as further undoing without a given reason in the edit notes says nothing but "I don't like this edit, so I'm going to remove it".
Topic on User talk:If and while
Of course. The user Wrace is very known in the LOK community to be the cause of many chaotic episodes in the past; including with Soul Reaver 2 and Blood Omen 2 a few months ago cuz the removal of many important details from their pages (luckily then restored). Then... Talking about Blood Omen 1, he had deleted an important description about the FSB issue and then he's reclamed that the "CubanRaul's Community Patch 2.0" would work for Win98 as well; when on the official website dedicated to that fix reports Win2k to be the minimum required for the v2.0. While for the v2.2, the minimum required is Win7 (source: http://cubanraul.altervista.org/kain/index.htm).
If the 2.0 version of the community patch works on Windows 98 with extra steps, such as needing to manually bypass the installer - the results of which could be provided in this very wiki's community files section for convenience - then I fail to see why the patch shouldn't be included in the article.
While I definitely have issue with how Wrace phrased his statement for Blood Omen 1, if the patch works as advertised in the fashion I described above, his past behavior **should not** be used as an excuse to ignore a useful solution for those unable to run the separate OpenGL version.