Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.

Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.

Topic on Talk:Grand Theft Auto V

This is a permanent link to a single version of this post. This version is from 10:43, 25 August 2022. You can see the differences from the previous version, or view other versions on the post history page.

"You're right. I'll add an explanation for those when I can and also only add things in the future once I'm done writing full instructions on them then." --> It's ok and thanks :) But would be nice indeed. Bloody wish others would do that too haha. Honestly I thought I sounded a bit too blunt to you haha, sorry. And if you ever need help with proper layout or something, don't be afraid to contact me through the PCGW discord, 'Maarten "mrtnptrs" Peters' on there.

"An altered w_halloween.xml file not being present in the mod means the in-game "halloween weather" won't have the far depth of field effect removed, however this shouldn't really matter since that's for GTA Online only, where you shouldn't be using mods like these anyway." --> Agree, so don't even have to mention that in a future note, great :)

"I already have external sources, it's the mod pages which have claims and screenshots proving those claims. I was the one bringing confirmation in this situation, not them." --> Yeah, you're actually right, the comments in there also give confirmations of course.

"Each mod works alone just fine. The mods also work together if you combine them first of course, but other than combining them nothing additional has to be done other than simply using OpenIV to install the mods like any other mod in the first place." --> Chill, can mention in a note that they work together then.

"I could try shortening each explanation, is that really ideal though? I don't see reference comment boxes being used that way that often." --> Don't make them too short, just to the point. And even though it is not done that often (I think because it is quite some work to really investigate things like this like you've done), it totally makes sense to me that when you add yourself as source, you can also just fill the comment/note of it with your findings, even if they are a bit long.