Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.


Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.

Topic on Talk:Grand Theft Auto V

"I could provide instructions to edit each thing manually, I just didn't want to bother doing it now. I might do it sometime." and "I thought about using something else as a reference instead of a topic on the talk page but doing it this way just seemed quicker." --> Not to sound rude, but this is I think one of the reasons why this wiki page and the GTA IV ones were such a mess; people quickly adding fixes without including proper sources and explanations/steps. So, would be nice that when you know the steps to apply these fixes manually, to add them to this wiki-page too :)

In my opinion it is good to when you add a fix to immediately add the steps too, otherwise it can be forgotten and then users have to figure it out from often vague instructions in the sources themselves.

"The mod is mostly up to date except for the w_halloween.xml file which came later in an update and isn't included in it." --> In what capacity does this affect the working of the No Far DOF / No Edge Blur / No Chromatic Aberration mod?

"I might just create a thread about it on the Discussions section of the game on Steam or a Reddit post and link it as reference." --> Yeah, could do that. Would be much better than a talk page here. But even better would be if you were able to find an external source from someone else on the web collaborating what you're saying.

"I'm currently playing the game with a combination of these three mods that I've made for myself." --> So they work together out-of-the-box without changes being needed? If not, that should probably be included. Also, adding instructions how to apply fixes manually would work around this whole issue of course.

"It is too big to add as a comment inside the reference box in my opinion." --> Well, if you do it for each effect individually and try to shorten the explanation a bit, it should be ok right?