Topic on Talk:Kingdom Under Fire: Heroes
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Aemony in the topic "References" on Talk:Kingdom Under Fire: Heroes.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
> There's posts about the fullscreen, font and sound issues on the steam forums, but all the info on using xbox version files are original research and can't be referenced. I can't bother to contribute to this wiki if it's gonna be wikipedia style referencing bullshit. | > There's posts about the fullscreen, font and sound issues on the steam forums, but all the info on using xbox version files are original research and can't be referenced. I can't bother to contribute to this wiki if it's gonna be wikipedia style referencing bullshit. | ||
− | While PCGamingWiki has some general guidelines for references and whatnot, as Expack3 mentioned it's not meant to prohibit original research, nor listing what can be described as "community confirmed issues" either. | + | While PCGamingWiki has some general guidelines for references and whatnot, as Expack3 mentioned it's not meant to prohibit original research, nor listing what can be described as "community confirmed issues" either. For example, a fixbox or bullet point with a reference to a Steam thread describing and detailing the issues should suffice in regards to covering the fact that the issues "exists." A user-based refcheck referencing yourself for the solutions (or a reference to a forum post detailing the solutions) would also suffice for the provided fixes. |
− | In this case, while the section you added was well intentional, it was also not following PCGW's editing guidelines which is required for articles to have a consistent style and layout. | + | In this case, while the section you added was well intentional, it was basically also not following PCGW's editing guidelines which is required for articles to have a consistent style and layout. |
Particular, the "Known issues" section you added would be more appropriately covered as an "Issues unresolved" or "Issues fixed" section. | Particular, the "Known issues" section you added would be more appropriately covered as an "Issues unresolved" or "Issues fixed" section. |