Topic on User talk:Macgovern

if you go into the some of the mod links that i removed previously you will notice that the creators of the mod said that their mod became obsolete or it was merged into another mod, i didn't remove it for no reason

Good to know. Had you listed that in the edit notes, I wouldn't have undone your original edit.

thanks. please check the changes i made and change, remove or add anything that you see fits the best.

Since your current edits are a continuation of this, I will put my full edit notes here instead of clogging up the pages for SADX and SA2.

I am more than aware of the poor quality of the games' PC ports. However, just dumping mods onto the page, especially ones which add 'features which should've been there' beyond vanilla, is not acceptable. The mod pages before my latest undo used to look like the pages of RDR2 and MELE before they were trimmed by PCGamingWiki staff for similar reasons to my own.

Furthermore, neither SADX nor SA2 have the breath and depth of content which, say, Grand Theft Auto IV or Skyrim do. The amount of mods for those games, especially for Grand Theft Auto IV, which arguably suffered just as bad a PC port as SADX and SA2 did, is thus understandable - but even then, there are still limits as to how many mods are shown on the site.

Please do not continue to edit the pages. It will be considered edit warring (see https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/PCGamingWiki:Code_of_conduct#Behavior), and I prefer to settle this without moderator arbitration.