Topic on Talk:SecuROM

This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Mirh in the topic "Plan" on Talk:SecuROM. You can see other versions of this post at its history page.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * there's a [https://web.archive.org/web/20031005050648/http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?threadid=67242 trainload] of [https://web.archive.org/web/20050817221706/http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=77695 stuff] to say about the disk-related shenanigans (I'm not ''exactly'' holding my breath over much people caring by now, but still)
-* somewhat like starforce, they were faulted for what were [https://web.archive.org/web/20211029000802/https://support.securom.com/pop_drakensang.html actually] Windows [https://web.archive.org/web/20081225070222/http://secusphere.com/smf/index.php?topic=6.0 bugs] (even though it did *once* happen it was them to [https://web.archive.org/web/20020727181932/http://nwn.bioware.com/forums/viewforum.html?forum=49 screw up])
+* somewhat like starforce, they were faulted for what [https://web.archive.org/web/20100106155334/http://nwn2forums.bioware.com/forums/viewtopic.html?topic=686278&forum=109 were] [https://web.archive.org/web/20211029000802/https://support.securom.com/pop_drakensang.html actually] Windows [https://web.archive.org/web/20081225070222/http://secusphere.com/smf/index.php?topic=6.0 bugs] (even though it did *once* happen it was them to [https://web.archive.org/web/20020727181932/http://nwn.bioware.com/forums/viewforum.html?forum=49 screw up])
 * <s>It was probably once they exhausted every possible "physical trick" to play with DVDs, that they resolved into just strengthening their VM and [https://web.archive.org/web/20080229134513/http://www.tuts4you.com/download.php?list.46 whatnot]. I wonder if Denuvo isn't just the continuation of this, once the "take care yourself of ownership checks" aspect was dropped (anyway tokens and registry keys should be documented)</s>