Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.

Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.

Topic on User talk:Aemony

This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Deton24 in the topic "Keeping Timer Resolution" on User talk:Aemony. You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Considering this, I still cannot really agree with your edit, though I understand what you mean, still, in my opinion, it is misleading. 1ms is not 0.500 ms.
 
Considering this, I still cannot really agree with your edit, though I understand what you mean, still, in my opinion, it is misleading. 1ms is not 0.500 ms.
−
But it is generally very small performance change, and considering that fact, we may say that the program is unnecessary in such case, but in the entry I already stated certain dependance while 30% performance increase existed when default resolution clock was changed from ~10ms to 0.500ms. Logically change from 1ms to 0.500ms won't give noticeable performance increase, and this the thing I'd write next to your note, to clarify what you mean if you don't have anything constructive against.
+
But it is generally very small performance change, and considering that fact, we may say that the program is unnecessary in such case. Though, in the entry I already stated certain dependance while 30% performance increase existed when default resolution clock was changed from ~10ms to 0.500ms. Logically change from 1ms to 0.500ms won't give noticeable performance increase - and this the thing I'd write next to your note, to clarify what you mean if you don't have anything constructive against.