Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.


Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.

Topic on User talk:Garrett

It's a burden in the sense that the more noobs are able to read scroll the page (some people have really little attention) the more I'm happy because I won't have to explain they had to read Essential improvements

Redundancy it's a bad thing for visual cleanliness (and we are not an airplane)

Fixes that are intrinsic to game go in its page.
If it's a OS problem or something like that they go wherever else it's more appropriate.

I don't get your point with infoboxes. They are there to help increase contrast of the actual solutions.

And one article or 100 articles it doesn't matter.

I know many could miss this, but that's why <path-to-game> has a link over it..

the real point in the end is that we need that goodamn general "assumptions" page