Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.


Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.

Topic on PCGamingWiki talk:GOG.com Enhancement Project/archive2

In my mind, it depends on whether a game belongs on the GOG.com game list is dependent on if it can still be downloaded by those who bought them after it's no longer sold by them. If yes, then simply update the articles to reflect this. If not, then remove them from the list and update the formerly-associated articles.

Also, without discussing the above, I see a point in both removing and not removing the Fallout games from the GOG.com list. For removing them from the list: yes, the articles are completed, but as the pages themselves show, they're still sold elsewhere, and it's a simple matter of noting on the appropriate pages that the games are no longer sold on the list and removing GOG.com from the availability charts. For not removing them from the list: the games can still be downloaded by those who purchased them before they were pulled, correct? So why not simply color-code them on the list to note it? Furthermore, should GOG.com be forced to remove the Fallout games from the collections of everyone who purchased them, color-code them again.