Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.
Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.
Not editable
Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike unless otherwise noted.
"The game idea is objectively stupid." Is not a valid reason to be deleting any page. Also, whoever cited that as the reason apparently does not know the meaning of the word "objectively". The words "objectively" and "stupid" being the same sentence in this manner contradict each other.
Why should this page stay? It can be filled with information. It's a real title. People being offended by things need to learn to evaluate why they are offended, instead of just calling things "stupid".
This is pretty funny. There are countless useless pages about VN's with 0 useful information but this gets "candidate for deletion" (something I haven't seen before here) because it's "a stupid game"? I can't wait for the wiki to start deleting every dumb game in existence because this hobby has no shortage of stupid games.
I consider any game that Valve allows on the Steam platform to be generally valid to be added on PCGamingWiki. If a moderator decides they don't want this on the website, that is fine, but if not then it should stay.
I admit I spat my tea out when checking out the recent changes and seeing that title right at the top. That being said, a game is a game whether or not people like the content in it. I'm not a fan of those obvious sex related games sold on Steam (and neither are a lot of folk being ridiculous on the discussions board for it, apparently) but it doesn't mean I get up in arms about it demanding censorship. The fact that most if not all of the hate being thrown at it is based on it being "dumb" says how unnecessary it is to wish for its removal. Why not just remove the entire Leisure Suit Larry series or any other silly throwaway title while they're at it?
So, if the game exists and has a release on a respectable platform, I see no reason it can't have a wiki entry. Easily offended be damned, it's just being snobby.
The moderator team has discussed this, and we haven't seen anything about this game that violates wiki policy. Please let us know if anyone has evidence to the contrary.