Talk:Dead Rising 3

  • (cur prev) 18:47, 15 February 2018 . . Flow talk page manager (talk | contribs) created the description . . (0)
  • (cur prev topic) 21:57, 21 January 2015 . . Mirh (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (You must recognize that huh in the end of a question is quite provocative though. As said we are totally fine with external reports. In p...) . . (+708)
  • (cur prev topic) 04:34, 21 January 2015 . . BONKERS (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (Inflammatory or accusative? I'm not doing either. I'm not the people are the ones taking it upon themselves to deem what is worthy of bei...) . . (+621)
  • (cur prev topic) 20:25, 14 January 2015 . . Andytizer (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (While don't have a specific set of rules governing 'key points/general information yet', this will be codified in the near future, and wi...) . . (+574)
  • (cur prev topic) 18:42, 14 January 2015 . . Anonymous (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (I'm not sure where you have gathered that from. However, I like to think we hold ourselves to a higher standard. Additionally, this is th...) . . (+757)
  • (cur prev topic) 14:59, 14 January 2015 . . Mirh (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (By the way, remember port reports should go under General information, not under key points) . . (+91)
  • (cur prev topic) 13:16, 14 January 2015 . . Primey (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (That's a bit daft. I could agree on the rule if the game has a PCGW Port report and it is more in depth than another port report from a d...) . . (+7)
  • (cur prev topic) 01:32, 14 January 2015 . . BONKERS (talk | contribs) commented on "So PCGW port reports are the objectively only allowable references for assesment of the quality of a port huh?" (You realize that sounds absurd right?) . . (+37)